The passage below describes a U.S. Supreme Court decision In 1940, the Texas Democratic Party refused to give an African America
n man a ballot to select candidates to run for Congress and governor. In finding this action unconstitutional "… this Court is not constrained to follow a previous decision which…, involves the application of a constitutional principle, rather than an interpretation of the Constitution to evolve the principle itself." Source: Smith v. Allwright (1944) What does this court decision illustrate? (Hard)
This decision illustrates that the court has the right to review any judicial decision.
Explanation:
One of the most well-known powers that is attributed to the Supreme Court is the ability to judicially review any act, considered unconstitutional, that is not written in the federal constitution. This power is being illustrated in the text above.
This is because the text shows how the supreme court, judicially revised the decision that the black population could receive ballots to cast votes for candidates for governor. The supreme court states that the inclusion of the black vote is not described in the constitution and for that reason, the black people 's voting permission may undergo judicial review.
Before Japan bombed parole harbor we didn't want to get involved in any of it. so the answer is D because that's when we got involved with other countries again.
By declaring themselves an independent nation, the American colonists were able to confirm an official alliance with the Government of France and obtain French assistance in the war against Great Britain.
