-3/2 x (-5 1/4) . please help me out

Nuclear Power is a perfect example of exponential relations. Canada produces over half of its electricity using nuclear reactors

mario62 [17]

Solution :

Nuclear fission is exponential. With uranium atoms arranged properly it is possible to have the fission effect and cause more and more uranium nuclei to fission. This is known as chain reaction and a number of uranium atoms are fission together to increase exponentially.

Canada, for example produces electricity using the process of fission process in its nuclear reactors.

But one of the problems with nuclear reactors is its disposal of the nuclear waste. The nuclear waste includes the used reactor fuel, uranium mill tailings and other radioactive wastes. They remain radioactive and are dangerous for the human health.

A). The long term nuclear waste are stored in deep excavations and covered with rocks and mud so that the harmful radioactive materials does not escape from them. They are also stored in some high density and thick cylinders and remained isolated in the dump yard from the people and nature.

B). Canada has a high source of renewable sources of energy. This is a clean source of energy and Canada can make best use of it. Most of the energy requirement of Canada can be taken care off by using wind energy. Canada is planning to set up wind energy mills in most of its part and generate electricity from it.

Canada has also installed several solar power projects which is clean and can help the people to use this solar energy to produce electricity.

Learn More :

brainly.com/question/1013815

7 0

3 years ago

Solve the given equation for v.

vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:(3t)^2

Step-by-step explanation:

Steps below

4 0

2 years ago

First right=brainliest:)))

Sophie [7]

Answer:

-4,7

Step-by-step explanation:

add both to get y=7

then sub y in 2 to get 8x+42=10

8x=-32

x=-4

3 0

3 years ago

Which additional information could be used to prove that the triangles are congruent using AAS or ASA? Check all that apply.

Ad libitum [116K]

Consider the given triangles.

Given: $\angle C \cong \angle Q$

ASA congruence criterion states that if two angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding parts of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.

AAS congruence criterion states that if two angles and a non-included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding parts of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.

Consider the first part:

1. In triangles ABC and QPT

If we take $\angle B \cong \angle P , BC \cong PQ$ along with the given condition.

Then the triangles are congruent by ASA congruence criterion.

2. If we take $\angle A \cong \angle T$ and $AC= TQ=3.2$ along with the given condition.

Then the triangles are congruent by ASA congruence criterion.

3. As, $\angle C \cong \angle Q$ , $\angle A \cong \angle T$ and $\angle B \cong \angle P$ , so the triangles can not be congruent.

4. If we take $\angle A \cong \angle T$ and $BC \cong PQ$ along with the given condition.

Then the triangles are congruent by AAS congruence criterion.

5. If we take AC=TQ=3.2 and CB=QP=3.2 along with the given condition, then the triangles are congruent but by SAS congruence criteria neither by ASA nor AAS congruence criterion.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Suppose a right cylinder was bent into a U-shape and was compared to another right cylinder. What can be said about their volume

Mazyrski [523]

Answer: B) there is not enough information to tell since they are not between parallel planes

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago