When you look at these two options:
<span><em>must vote on all revenue bills according to how the majority political party decides</em>
<em> is not eligible to serve on any committee that contains members of another political party</em>
These would mean that the majority party would face no opposition in the parliament; but this is not true; we can reject this option.
The other two options are similar but opposites. Which one is true?
The true description of the Members of the House of Representatives is the following:
</span>
<span>is not required to be a resident of the district elected to represent but usually is by tradition
- they're not required to live in the district they represent.
</span>
<span />
A document making an argument about a historical event is most likely to be credible if it makes claims that are corroborated by other sources. Option C. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
a historical event?</h3>
Generally, historical occurrences, in particular those connected to a certain time period, area, or topic in the course of European history.
In conclusion, A historical document's credibility increases if its assertions can be backed up by other reliable accounts of the same or similar events.
Read more about historical events
brainly.com/question/5499406
#SPJ1
PETRONAS TOWER is the most important landmark.
It is the tallest office building in world
Answer:During the late 1700s to mid 1800s, a growing opposition to slavery was taking place in the United States.This growing opposition was visible in the ways people were beginning to speak out against slavery through abolitionist movements, along with some aspects of the Wilmot Proviso.People’s consciences were also stirred by the novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin.
PLZ mark me as brainlyest