Answer:
Periodicity assumption
Explanation:
Periodicity assumption is the one which is also called as the time period assumption, it is described as the accounting guideline which follows the accountants to divide or separate the complex, the ongoing activities of the business into the periods of the week, quarter, month and year.
Therefore, the assumption of the periodicity, assumes the life of the company to be divided or separated into the artificial time periods in order to provide the timely information to the external users.
Answer:
Informal feedback
Explanation:
In simple words, informal feedback relates to the feedback under which the feedback is not planned by either of the parties involved and the conversation regarding the review just happens occasionally unplanned. I
Generally, In such feedback there is no exchange of information but one party dictates their view to the other. Hence, from the above we can conclude that the given case is an instance of informal feedback.
Answer:
The correct answer is "consumer price index"
Explanation:
The average of the prices paid by customers for goods and services, belonging at the fixed market basket is called Consumer Price Index (CPI). The consumer price index is an excellent measure or indicator of inflation. It's calculated and measured by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Answer:
Explanation:
3,800 units
x 0.05 hours per unit
190 labor hous
x $9.90 per hour
$1,881
4,300 units
x 0.05 hours per unit
215 labor hours
x $9.90 per hour
$2,128.5
We first multiply units bythe time it takes to do a single unit,
this will be the total labor hours required for the production
Then we apply the labor rate to get the labor cost.
Answer: d. under the minimum-contacts test.
Explanation:
Cattle House Steaks, a Colorado company, enters into a contract over the phone with Beef Packing Inc., an out-of-state corporation. If a dispute arises, a Colorado court can exercise jurisdiction over Beef Packing under the minimum-contacts test.
Minimum contacts applies to situations whereby a court in one state can assert its personal jurisdiction over another defendant which isn't in that same state but is in another state.