The that is NOT a difference between parliamentary debate and both the policy and Lincoln-Douglass debates would be: <span>B. The parliamentary debate is the same as the Lincoln-Douglass debate style
The lincoln-douglass debate sytyle use one-versus-one format in the debate, meanwhile the Parliamentary debate style use two-versus-two format in the debate.</span>
It seems that you missed the given choices of the question above; but anyway, here is the correct answer. The correct answer would be RHETORIC. When you are able to convince your principal to cancel an assembly because of a political concern, this situation is an example of a rhetoric. Rhetoric is defined as the art of persuasion by using effective written, spoken or visual language.
Through the 1920s, Britain's economy was already struggling to pay for the effects of World War I. Then, in 1929, the US stock market crashed. ... The value of British exports halved, plunging its industrial areas into poverty: by the end of 1930, unemployment more than doubled to 20 per cent.
Brainliest please?
