Answer:Conservation biologists, philosophers, environmental ethicists, and others offer several key reasons to conserve biodiversity. One argument is that organisms have direct economic value for humans. We use plants and animals for medicines, food, clothes, building materials, recreation, and other luxuries and necessities. But what if an organism that is of no use to us for food or hides is screened for useful medicinal compounds and found to have none? Do we sanction its extermination? Why must a plant or animal be of direct economic benefit to humans to have worth? Economic value alone is not the only reason to preserve biodiversity.
Another reason often given…to conserve biodiversity is that organisms, as components of ecosystems, provide services, and their interactions with other organisms contribute to the overall healthy functioning of ecosystems… On a practical level, biologists want to know just how much the loss of a few species will reduce the quality of services within a specific ecosystem. Two schools of thought prevail.
If the results of an experiment have different conclusions, something must have changed. these are called **variables**. if more than one variable is changed, the result would be different. because the total conclusion is different, it is a hypothesis, because it is not universally true.
Blue sold PC Mac b B bbbfchm
The reaction which connects monomers (polymerization) is dehydration synthesis.
The name tells you about the nature of the reaction - dehydration means 'loss of water', correct? When two biological monomers connect, one gives up a hydrogen ion (H+), and the other gives up a hydroxyl group; (OH-). They combine to form H2O - water.
