In "To Kill a Mockinbird," by Harper Lee, the narrator is Scout, a five yearl-old girl in rural Southern America. Through her eyes, readers can see a story of racism and prejudice with her innocent and thoughtful view, without any lies. Her father Atticus has raised her wisely to encourage her individuality, and is convinced that she is absolutely able to realize when somebody hides something. Her experiences facing good and evil situations eventually turn her into a mature young girl by the end of the story.
We can actually deduce here that the reason wealthy corporations have more power in social problems process than low income communities is because these wealthy corporations possess the financial capacity to solve the social problems.
<h3>What are social problems?</h3>
Social problems are known to be issues that are prevalent in the society which hinder and hamper the society from making progress and reaching its potentials, goals and objectives.
Social problems can also be referred to as social issues.
These social issues or problems might include crimes, corruption, economic recession, etc.
We see that wealthy corporations can actually wield more power that low income communities during social problems.
Learn more about social problems/issues on brainly.com/question/5105464
#SPJ1
Answer:
The essay of Barbara Holland speaks in favor of having one child so that parents can have more peace, time for themselves, and control over the child. Many children can have various demands, they develop separately, and this can rob parents of their time, privacy, and comfort. When there is one child, parents outnumber the child and can dedicate themselves more to personal self-development.
Explanation:
<u>Barbara Holland claims that when there is more than one child in the family they instantly outnumber the parents, and therefore can’t be under good control, discipline, and taught manners. </u>There are more problems and obligations that parents have to handle.
Parents can never be comfortable nor provide time for themselves. They are <u>robbed of privac</u>y, time for conversation, and their marriage can be affected by this. <u>Parents won’t have the privilege to develop themselves as individuals. </u>
Holland claims <u>every child will develop it’s “own culture” </u>and want separate things and have individual demands. <u>They become “counterculture” in the family, in contrast to parents</u>. Parents have to satisfy their demands and accept their conditions, instead of otherwise.
Answer:
HEEFF
Explanation:
This explains the wider implications of the text better than AFOREST or LOD.
I'm fairly certain it's the first answer but it may be the third answer as well but I believe it's the first more though.
