The second part of this question (<em>You must include an evaluation of YOUR congressional representative with at least TWO specific examples of why you approve or disapprove of his/her performance</em>) is a personal task, and only you can complete it. However, we are able to provide some assistance with the first part.
It is true that Congress typically has a very low public opinion rating, while at the same time people rate their individual representatives highly. The main reason for this is the fact that people tend to think of their individual representatives as personally closer to them.
A person's representative tends to come from the same city or neighbourhood as the voter. Moreover, he tends to campaign in this area. Therefore, the voter is able to see his face, hear his voice and listen to his platform often. This creates a sense of trust and a connection between representative and voter. Moreover, as the voter himself votes the representative in, he is also more likely to be hopeful about his performance. All of these factors lead to people rating their own individual representatives more highly than Congress itself.
The answer to this question is
"Prophetic"
Definition-accurately describing or predicting what will happen in the future.
Answer:
Explanation:
A catalyst is a substance that increases the rate of a chemical reaction without itself getting consumed in the reaction as it helps in decreasing the activation energy. Thus, rate of reaction also increases.
A positive catalyst helps in increasing the rate of a chemical reaction whereas a negative catalyst decreases the rate of a chemical reaction.
Whereas when we increase the temperature then collisions between the particles increases due to increase in kinetic energy. Hence, rate of reaction increases with increase in temperature.
Thus, we can conclude that out of the given options adding a positive catalyst will increase the rate of a chemical reaction.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/1572744#readmore
Answer:
sisidkjsjsjssjsjsjissiddkkdk
Explanation:
kskekekdjdjddi
