Answer:
d. Choose Option B because it has a higher NPV
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
For Option A:
Investment = $10 million
Present Value of cash flows = Cash flow ÷ Discounting rate
= $2 ÷ 10%
= $20 million
Now
NPV = $20 - $10
= $10 million
We know that
IRR is the rate at which the NPV will be zero
So, 2 ÷ r - 10 = 0
r = 20%
For Option B:
Investment = $50 million
Present Value of cash flows = $6.5 ÷ 10% = $65 million
NPV = $65 - $50 = $15 million
we know that
IRR is the rate at which the NPV will be zero
So, 6.5÷ r -50 = 0
r = 13%
Based on NPV, Option B should be selected as it contains higher NPV as compared to option A.
However, Based on IRR, Option A should be chosen as it contains higher IRR and a higher IRR represent a higher profit percentage
Helps perform calculations and other manipulations of data
Answer:
$120,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Purchase value of an equipment = $120,000
Trade in allowance = $95,000
Paid cash = $25,000
Cost of an old equipment = $110,000
Accumulated depreciation = $33,000
So by considering the above situation, the recorded value of the equipment is $120,000 as the cash is paid for $25,000 and the trade in allowance is $95,000
So it would be equal to the purchase value i.e $120,000
Answer:
c. transactions involving foreign investment in the United States and U.S investment abroad.
Explanation:
The capital account provides the record of foreign investment transactions occurring between a country and another country. It gives an idea of money coming in and out of the state. A surplus in the capital account record is indicative of the inflow of money in the country, while a deficit indicates the loss of money.
Debt accrued by a country, banking, loans and investment are all reflected in the capital account record. So, for a person to determine a nations assets and liabilities, the capital account would provide an accurate insight to that information.
Answer:
At one time, the centrally planned economy of China encouraged farmers to produce iron in their backyards, rather than have factories make iron. This proved unsuccessful, since most of the farmers' iron was of poor quality. Why do you think this approach was unsuccessful? How could this experiment become a success in a free market economy?
The reason why the approach whereby farmers make iron in their backyard could not work out is as a result of not being inclined in that market as they are only skilled in agriculture, also they do not understand the rhetorics of the business.
The experiment would be a success in a free market as anyone is allowed to sell such product, this gives room for competition and helps to price reduction which is good for the consumers, also it would help in improvement of such product's quality because of competition involved
Explanation:
