Answer and Explanation:
The rule of 72 refers the time period in which your investment which you invest should be doubled
So based on the rule of 72, the computation is shown below:
1. doubling time for France per capita real GDP is
= Rule of 72 ÷ rate
= 72 ÷ 1.9
= 37.89 years
2. Doubling time for Korea per capita real GDP is
= Rule of 72 ÷ rate
= 72 ÷ 4.2
= 17.14 years
3. France per capita real GDP in year 2045 is
= Per capita read GDP × (1 + growth rate)^time period
= $28,900 × 1.019^42
= $63,710.88
4. Korea per capita real GDP in year 2045 is
= Per capita read GDP × (1 + growth rate)^time period
= $12,700 × 1.042^42
= $71,490.43
The time period 42 comes from
= 2045 - 2003
= 42 years
<span>Breached.
Explanation: A contract is a legally binding agreement between two parties. Once an agreement is signed between two parties, both parties are subject to terms and conditions written in the agreement.
As in the above example, Flora agrees to sell harvesters grocery a minimum quantity of fresh fruits and vegetables every week for three months, that means Flora is subject to the agreement that she will sell that no matter what the future market price will be, whether it increases or decreases. As Flora decides not to deliver the agreed order, it is a violation of terms and conditions of the agreement/contract. So the contract is breached.</span>
Answer:
The answer is Vista Estates
Explanation:
Before any sale can done done, notice must be given to Vista Estates. The property can now be sold after been giving proper notice.
Vista Estates still has the legal right of original ownership even though a lien has been placed on his property. A lien is a legal claim against a property.
Answer:
The answer is 9.85%
Explanation:
The number of periods N = 9years(10 years minus 1 year ago)
Yield to Maturity (I/Y) = ?
Present value of the bond (PV) = $950.70
Future value of the bond(FV) = $1,000
Annual payment (PMT) = $90 (9% x $1,000)
Using a financial calculator to solve the problem ( BA II plus Texas instruments):
Yield to Maturity (I/Y) = 9.85%
(Paragraph 1) Should eyewitness testimony be allowed in the courtroom? No but at the same time yes. There are many reasons why they should but shouldn't. It is a risk to their safety, some eyewitnesses are not liable, they could be paid off but at the same time their testimony could help win a case. (Paragraph 2) Depending on a crime, the eyewitness safety could be in danger. If the case was against a member of a gang or mafia. They could send someone after that witness. This is reason why we have the Witness Protection Program. If they testify they put their lives at risk. (Paragraph 3) Having a witness is a key thing to have. If you have a witness you are the one who most likely the one to win the case. In some cases you could have problems with the witness not being liable, getting paid off to not say anything or to lie. Or in most cases if they are confused they will not have them testify. Or they aren't straight on the details and keep changing the story that usually means they are lying on what they saw.
Note: This is a summary. Add more and edit it to make it sound like something you would type.
