B. Australia.
Hope this helps!!!:)
Answer:
The US stated that the intent was to remove "a regime that developed and used weapons of mass destruction, that harbored and supported terrorists, committed outrageous human rights abuses, and defied the just demands of the United Nations and the world. For the invasion of Iraq the rationale was "the United States relied on the authority of UN Security Council Resolutions 678 and 687 to use all necessary means to compel Iraq to comply with its international obligations".
I hope this helps a little bit.
He basically said "It's all good in the hood. We just need to chill, we ain't got no problem. Nothing here to be scared of."
Answer: Albeit the Founding Fathers never planned it to be like this, partisanship and a two party framework are critical pieces of US legislative issues since they take into consideration "groups to be shaped"- - groups that can more readily get across specific thoughts and party stages to general society.
Since there are just two significant gatherings, US residents feel that they just host a decision between one get-together or the other.
Since there are just two significant gatherings, the gatherings will in general differ enormously on many issues, taking possibly one outrageous side of the contention or the other.
On occasion, there have been endeavors to make a suitable outsider, yet these gatherings infrequently have sufficient help to be on an equivalent balance with the two fundamental gatherings.
