The question is an illustration of a division model.
The boxes will be completed with: 1650, 231, 50 and 7
The expression is represented as:
Express 1881 as 1650 + 231.
Split
Evaluate each division
The above illustration means that, the boxes will be completed with the following numbers
See attachment for proper illustration
Read more about division models at:
brainly.com/question/15163437
Answer:
Nonlinear
Step-by-step explanation:
This is nonlinear because its parent function is y = 
. The parent function of a linear equation is y = x.
I hope this helps :))
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
for c it would be 1\8
for E it would be 3\8
Its an indirect proof, so 3 steps :-
1) you start with the opposite of wat u need to prove
2) arrive at a contradiction
3) concludeReport · 29/6/2015261
since you wanto prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', you start wid the opposite of above statement, like below :- step1 : Since we want to prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', lets start by assuming the opposite, that the diagonals of parallelogram dont bisect each other.Report · 29/6/2015261
Since, we assumed that the diagonals dont bisect each other,
OC≠OA
OD≠OBReport · 29/6/2015261
Since, OC≠OA, △OAD is not congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
∠AOD≅∠BOC as they are vertical angles,
∠OAD≅∠OCB they are alternate interior angles
AD≅BC, by definition of parallelogram
so, by AAS, △OAD is congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
But, thats a contradiction as we have previously established that those triangles are congruentReport · 29/6/2015261
step3 :
since we arrived at a contradiction, our assumption is wrong. so, the opposite of our assumption must be correct. so diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other.
Answer: x= 29°
Step-by-step explanation: Add angles D and C. Subtract from 180.
58/2 = 29
