Answer:
Similarities
1. Both documents advocated for the rights and liberty of the citizens.
2. Both documents prevented autocratic rule by ensuring the proper representation of the people.
Differences
1. The English Bill of Rights was borne out of political tensions while the US Bill of Rights was an amendment to the constitution.
2. They both differed in content. The English Bill of Rights contained information on the rights of citizens, reasons while the then Monarchs were rightful successors to the throne, and details of the ills committed by King James. The US Bill of Rights simply amended the constitution.
Explanation:
The English Bill of Rights was signed into law in the year 1689 by William III and Mary II in response to the political and religious tensions happening at the time. This Bill of Rights gave powers to the Parliament and made them a source that must be consulted before critical decisions were made by the Monarchs. It also outlined the rights of citizens.
The US Bill of Rights received its blueprint from the English Bill of Rights. It was established in 1789 as 12 amendments to the constitution. It outlined the rights of the United States citizens, one of which was the Freedom of Speech.
Self improvement is the answer to ur question
The correct answer is D. Weed tree that wreaks havoc on the environment is referred to favorably as the "tree-of-heaven."
Explanation:
Irony occurs when the outcome in a situation is not the one expected or words have an opposite meaning to the literal meaning. In the excerpt, there is irony because the three known as the "tree-of-heaven" in China is an invasive and harmful species. This can be seen in "implacable invaders capable of rooting in tiny chinks in subway tunnels" and in "heaving up sidewalks and wreaking havoc in sewers" that shows the power the tree has to invade spaces and destroy structures despite the name suggests the tree is positive. This means there is an incongruence between the expectations about the tree and the reality. Thus, the statement that explains irony is statement D.
This question is missing the excerpt. I've found it online. It is the following:
Read the excerpt from "Children of the Drug Wars."
By sending these children away, "you are handing them a death sentence," says José Arnulfo Ochoa Ochoa, an expert in Honduras with World Vision International, a Christian humanitarian aid group. This abrogates international conventions we have signed and undermines our credibility as a humane country. It would be a disgrace if this wealthy nation turned its back on the 52,000 children who have arrived since October, many of them legitimate refugees.
The underlined words and phrases have strong negative connotations. How do they support the author's purpose? [...]
Answer:
They support the author's purpose because:
A. They draw attention to the opinion that the United States is not doing enough to help these children.
Explanation:
<u>Even though the excerpt is missing the underlined words and phrases, there is only one option that has any true connection with what is being said. The excerpt is about how the U.S. has been failing to help children who arrive in the country as refugees. Instead of welcoming them with care and safety, they are often sent away, back to their countries. It is clear that the U.S. is not doing enough for those children. Therefore, the correct option is letter A.</u>
Options B through D can be easily eliminated. This excerpt does not concern other countries' roles in this crisis, international conventions, or the way in which the U.S. will be regarded by other nations.
