Answer:
Vera Incorporated
Change in annual operating income from discontinued business:
Annual Operating Income would reduce by $78,000.
Explanation:
a) Calculation of the Net Income Lost:
Loss of Contribution ($99,000)
Avoidable fixed cost $21,000
Reduction of Income ($78,000)
b) The line of purses contributes $80,000 towards the company's fixed cost. Therefore, discontinuing this line of business would lead to the loss of this steam of income. The amount of reduced operating income will be $78,000 ($80,000 - 2,000).
Answer:
Earnings for the year = Addition to retained earnings + Dividend paid = $643,000 + $40,000 = $683,000
a. Earnings per share = Earnings / No of shares = $683,000 / 750,000 = 0.91
Dividend per share = Dividend / No of shares = $40,000 / 750,000 = 0.05
Book value per share = Ending equity / No of shares = $7,380,000 / 750,000 = $9.84
b. Market price per share is 30.8. Market to book ratio = $30.80 / $9,84 = $3.13
c. Price earning ratio = $30.80/$0.91 = $33.82
Total sales = $10,680,000, Sales per share = 14.24
Price sales ratio = Market price / Sales = $30.80 / $14.24 = $2.16
Stock markets is a stock exchange and a bond market is where dept securities are issues and traded
Answer:
The answer to this question is (c) Labour, Labour intensive
In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, the country with a relative abundance of labour will have a production possibility frontier that is biased toward production of the labour intensive good
Explanation:
The Heckscher-Ohlin model is an economic theory that proposes that countries export what they can most efficiently and plentifully produce.
The model emphasizes the export of goods requiring factors of production that a country has in abundance. It also emphasizes the import of goods that a nation cannot produce as efficiently. It takes the position that countries should ideally export materials and resources of which they have an excess, while proportionately importing those resources they need.
Therefore in regard to the question above,
In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, the country with a relative abundance of labour will have a production possibility frontier that is biased toward production of the labour intensive good
Hence the answer is the third option, Labour, Labour intensive
Answer:
Brief summary of the case:
The case deals about the evolution of kindle by Company A. When the company decided to introduce kindle, its price was $399 in 2007. Company A understood that to be successful against the huge competitors, kindle must be priced low. It must be highly reliable, many features and elegance must be provided in the design of kindle. "Company A- designed kindle in State C where the research and development expertise is available.
Market research firm "IS," estimated that the manufacturing cost of kindle is about $185. The expensive components of the kindle are the display used in the Electronic ink technology and wireless cord. Company A contracted with Country C's company to produce the display. A manufacturer in Continent A produced a wireless cord of $13. Many components were contracted to the different countries to reduce the cost of the kindle to be competitive. Now, kindle became the competitor to the massive companies.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Electronic reader K in Country U:
If Company had decided to manufacture all the components in Country U, then it would have been more expensive. Company A cannot sell that at an affordable price. Increase in the cost of the components would increase the overall cost of the Electronic reader K. The most important strategy of Company A is to minimize the cost of the product to increase the number of sales.
Increase in the manufacturing cost will dilute their competitive advantage and it increases the cost of the product. It will lower the sales and the buyers would prefer to use the competitors' products, which are cheaper.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Tablet F in Country U:
It would be expensive if they decide to manufacture the components in Country U. It will not affect the sales number like Electronic reader K. as Tablet F is multipurpose. People will prefer quality and specifications than price.
Conclusion:
Manufacturing in Country U would be expensive and it increases the overall cost of the product. It would affect sales of the products.
