Answer:
B. Kublai Khan was able to conquer all of China, while Genghis Khan
was not.
Explanation:
He was able to increase the empire and even conquer more. Compared to his father, he was really successful.
<span>owned land west of the mountains</span>
Hope this helps-------------------
It is like Nixon said, "no event in American history is more misunderstood than the Vietnam War." I can't give a clear answer but I do have some food for thought which may paint a big picture.
1. You have to keep in mind that Vietnam was not about who killed more troops.
If the winner of the Vietnam war was declared by who killed more troops than the U.S. would win hands down. The U.S. casualties were roughly half a million, where as the Vietcong suffered a little more than a million. Then how did we lose?
2. Keep in mind that at this time technology has improved and Vietnam is the first war where people are watching it go on right at home on there television screen.
They are seeing their sons being shot and viewing dead soldiers every single day.
You did not see this in WW1 or WW2 or the Korena War.
The letter a person is received from a fried or a relative is the informal letter, many times that kind of letter makes the person emotional and happy as the letter make the people remember about their experience with friends.
<h3>What is an informal letter?</h3>
Informal letter is always send by the person who is known to them and have a bond or relation. Informal letters are very self-generated in manner.
This kind of letter is for the newsy purpose, and the tone of the letter is friendly and joyously.
Thus, letter makes the person emotional and happy
For more details about informal letter, click here:
brainly.com/question/6321526
#SPJ1
