Answer:
Although you have not put in the texts necessary for this question to be answered, we can say that the purpose and the audience present whether a text should be structured and provide details in a more academic and technical way, or more simple and accessible by different people.
Explanation:
The writing of Jon Winthrop and Jonathan Edwards has different structures and details, due to their purposes and the audience they want to reach with the writing.
This must be established by any writer, because when it is desired to reach a more mature audience academically and a member of a specific class within society, a more complex text must be established, with technical or specific terms and stimulate the reasoning and discussion of that audience . On the other hand, when the goal is to attract a more immature audience academically, a simpler text should be structured, with details that cover factors that make up the full understanding of this audience.
Since historical fiction usually talks about a certain era in history, I'd say the correct answer is that 'it's set against a historical backdrop'. hope it helps you
Answer:
The revision which is the best example of adding concrete detail is:
Claire Innes was separated from the people around her during the fire and she later found them near the same place they were separated.
The other options do not apply because the original sentence does not talk about Claire Innes' parents or family
Claire Innes became separated from her parents as the flames spread through the city, and she later found them.
In the panic, Claire Innes was separated from her family as they fled, and she was reunited with her father after the fire was extinguished.
In the panic, Claire Innes became separated from her brothers and sisters during the fire and she later found them after the fire was put out.
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
"The Skin I'm In" is a story about racism, prejudice, bulling, insecurity, white supremacy, impunity, self-esteem, support, sense of belonging and self-expression. The author uses Maleeka's life and all the problems related to it and its appearance to portray such important themes that are more present in reality than what we imagine.
In relation to these themes, I do not believe that the author should modify the end of the story, or even change the end of the characters. In order to achieve the objectives of the narrative and present all these themes in a realistic way, it is necessary that each character has the ending that he had. Especially Maleeka, who presents with her mistakes, embraces her own personality and speaks the truth about the things that are happening to her, without protecting anyone out of fear or the need for friendship.
The end of each character represents the end that each archetype they represent must be in real life, so the story is identifiable and personal for all those who read it.