Answer:
A group comparison study
Explanation:
In group comparison study, an experiment compares two groups(the beareaved and nonbeareaved adults in the above study) such as in testing the effects of a treatment where a "comparison group" receives either an alternative treatment or no treatment so that it functions as a source of "counterfactual" causal inference for the purpose of the experiment.
Answer:
False it is actually B. a mistrial
Explanation:
Majority verdicts are not allowed in criminal cases in the United States, and so a hung jury results in a mistrial.
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
It is cumulative voting agreement, as everything about the question just points to it. Suzy and Philip agreements was to aid voting for a certain group of people nominated for the Syllibar Corporation board of directors. It is cumulative because it both of them votes will aid a certain good of people nominated for the syllubar directors ,without both of them colliding to aid this voting it is possible it the group of people might not make it ,so the cumulative of both is will make the nomination work.
