Answer:
Hub and spoke system
Explanation:
Costco Wholesale Corporation is a company that operates in the warehouse industry. They store merchandise at a lower cost than other wholesale or retail sources.
They aim to reduce warehousing cost for small and medium scale businesses.
In the hub and spoke system each component of the warehousing system are independent and contribute to the central warehousing activity.
It is also called the master feeder structure.
Freight traffic is moved to the central hub through spokes that are arranged around the centre like a wheel.
This system reduces the travel time and therefore is more efficient with lower cost
Answer:
net income: $ 451,010
EPS: $ 6.32 per share
Explanation:
net sales 2,409,200
cost of good sold (1,464,600)
gross profit: 944,600
operating expenses:
selling expenses (284,000)
operating income 660,600
non operating:
interest revenue 38,100
interest expense (54,400)
non operating expense (16,300)
earning before taxes: 644,300
tax expense: 30% 193,260
net income 451,010
shares outstanding 71,390
Earning per share: 451,010/71,390 = 6,31755
Answer:
Apportioned set-up cost
Plus =$21,600
Max=$43,200
Explanation:
Activity-based costing is a form of absorption costing where overheads are charged to product using cost drivers.
<em>Under this method, overheads are first analyzed and categorized by the activities responsible for them and then charged to product based on the amount of benefits enjoyed using cost drivers. </em>
<em>The cost driver in this scenario is the number of set-ups</em>
Activity rate per driver is calculated as:
Activity overhead for the period / Total cost drivers for the period
So, we can apply this formula to the scenario above:
Set-up overhead= $64,800
Total set-ups for the period = 20 + 40 = 60
Overhead cost per set-up = $64,800/60=1,080
Set-up cost allocation:
Plus - 20 × 1,080=$21,600
Max- 40 × 1,080=$43,200
Apportioned set-up cost
Plus =$21,600
Max-=$43,200
Answer:
MIRR -16.50%
They should reject the project is it destroys capital it do not meet to pay up the cost of the investment.
A typical firm’s IRR will be greater than its MIR
If the project yields higher than the cost of capital the IRR will be higher than the MIRR as reinvest the cashflow at the project yield rather than copany's cost of capital, thus it overstate the return.
Explanation:
WACC (cost of capital, reinvestment and financiation rate) = 7%
<em>Cash inflow:</em>
Year 1 275000 336,886.825
Year 3 450000 481500
Year 4 450000 450000
Total 1,268,386.825
<em>Cash outflow:</em>
F= -2,500,000
Year 2 -125000 - 109, 179.841
Total 2,609,179.841
Now we can solve for MIRR:
![MIRR = \sqrt[n]{\frac{FV \: inflow}{PV \: outflow}} -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=MIRR%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5Bn%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7BFV%20%5C%3A%20inflow%7D%7BPV%20%5C%3A%20outflow%7D%7D%20-1)
![MIRR = \sqrt[4]{\frac{1,268,386.82}{2,609,179.84}} -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=MIRR%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%2C268%2C386.82%7D%7B2%2C609%2C179.84%7D%7D%20-1)
MIRR - 16.49991% = -16.50%
