Answer:
a. The current market value of the land
Explanation:
An expansion project costing plays a huge role. According to relevant cost, all irrelevant cost in the business should not be considered while analyzing a project. In the past, cost incurred in purchase of the land and its improvement is sunk cot, hence these expenditure ares irrelevant while analyzing the expansion project. The only cost which is to be considered is current market value of the land.
Answer:
q1- a q2-c
Explanation:
you have to create the account first
Answer:
the balloon payment after 300 months is $1,205,266.38
Explanation:
In order to pay the loan completely after 300 months, your monthly payment should be $1,948.75. Since you can only pay $800 per month, the loan's balance after 300 payments will be $1,205,266.38. This is irrational since you will end up owing 4 times the initial amount. You will never even be close to paying even the interest expense, so the principal increases every month.
I prepared an amortization schedule using an excel spreadsheet
Answer:
B. $32.37
Explanation:
The computation of the maximum price for paying the share today is shown below:
Let us assume the buying price be x
Now we applying the following formula
Return = (sale price - buy price + dividend) ÷ (buy price)
12% = ($35 - x + $1.25) ÷ x
0.12 = $36.25 - x
1.12x = $36.25
x = $36.25 ÷ 1.12
= $32.37
Hence, the correct option is B.
Question Completion with options:
a. Past performance information provided directly by the offeror should not be relied upon.
b. The past performance evaluation satisfies the responsibility determination required under FAR subpart 9.1.
c. Evaluations should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.
d. Offerors with demonstrated past performance that is neither relevant nor recent must not be removed from further consideration for award.
Answer:
The statement that is true regarding the evaluation of the past performance is:
c. Evaluations should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.
Explanation:
It has been established that past performance is the best indicator of future performance. Past performance can predict future performance, behavior, and success. Organizations that achieve some good performance in the past build the required confidence, which will help them to forge ahead in the present and future. This is why in selecting companies for a negotiated competitive services acquisition, even the past performance of predecessor companies should be reviewed to get a better handle on the company's ability to deliver on the projects.
