Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
Check the price of the bag and see if it is equal to the money you have collected
The truth about open-end mutual funds is that they <span>are bought or sold at their net asset value.
</span><span>Open-end mutual fund is a type of fund which shares are bought and sold on demand at their net asset value, or NAV, which is based on the value of the fund's underlying securities and is generally calculated at the close of every trading day.</span>
Answer:
correct answer is Order winner
Explanation:
in the supply chain, every firm want more profit
for more profit, they want increase their supply chain and sell more product
so in this competitive characteristics customer choose 1 company product over another company with their attractive offers
so as that order winder is special products and service that attribute desire from the customers that enable the company to win by beating competition in the market
so correct answer is Order winner
FOR:
- increased income for workers
- more workers attracted to the workforce
- less strain on federal resources for those in poverty
Against
- more costly for businesses
- possible unemployment due to job automation
- higher prices for consumers.
Here are some basic arguments. You will need to explain these a bit more for your assignment though.
