I know the answer isn't C or D. A or B both seem likely until you see that B involves a 'comma without a conjunction,' either way you should never put a comma before 'and'; I am not sure why but I am pretty sure this only applies in a formal document. So your answer is A.
The statement that best explains why Shakespeare has Cassius use the word <em>fawn</em> rather than a synonym such as <em>flatter</em> to describe his actions is the A: Fawn is more negative, suggesting manipulation of another for personal gain. In the excerpt that this question is referring to, the shrewd Cassius is going to reveal some aspects of Brutus's personality, or of his behavior, that he cannot see, and he asks him to trust in him, unless he saw him flattering somebody and then slandering him on their back; in that case, Cassius concludes, Brutus could be suspicious of him. Shakespeare is using the word <em>fawn </em>in Cassius's speech in order to emphasize his manipulative and devious traits. The word does have a negative connotation, and it often implies disapproval of that person's actions.
I think those aspects have a big influence on Holocaust literature. The genre adds more atmosphere to give reader opportunity to feel what happened. Either point of view have the same imortance but in the other way. It shows how it was going on from different attitudes or sides as Holocaust is very serious event.
She is completing step 4, which is where you ask the audience questions, keeping them curious to continue readin' so they have an answer.
<em>Hope you find this helpful :-)</em>
Hi. Although you submitted a text, you did not submit any questions about it. This makes it impossible for me to give you an answer. However, I will try to help you by showing you what this text means.
Generally speaking, we can state that the text presents how to make students review texts frequently, can improve the ability of these students to proofread and edit a text, making the text more coherent and fluid, with the modification of the entire structure and text composition. The text above reinforces that this is a result of repeated revisions, which shows that the more revisions students do, the more efficient their ability to edit a text efficiently.
