According to the conflict theory of crime and deviance, social inequality and power underlie how crime, deviance and punishment is characterized. The wealthy and influential members in society determine whom and which behaviors are deemed deviant and punishable. The conflict theory can be misused to rationalize behavior because it implies that there aren't any behaviors or individuals who are inherently deviant , instead behaviors and individuals are deemed deviant when they do not serve the interests of affluent members of society.
Answer: Constitutions usually come into being in Constitutional assembly. First step: general elections to constitutional assembly, Second step: constitutional assembly forms a comission that draws proposal(s) of constitution. Constitutional text is approved and adopted by Constitutional assembly.
Explanation: Constitutional assembly is later substituted (by means of legislative elections) by legislature (lower chamber of parliament of congress).
Answer:
Explanation:
The school bell rang right after the test got handed to me. i eagerly turned it around excited to see my score i was THRILLED with the result i sighed of relive and sprinted!! out the class . i stopped in the hall felling a bunch of sparks of happiness inside me i was proud of myself. there she is!! i see my mom!! i run and show my mom the score i got she was as thrilled as i was! we were both extremely happy
Answer:
Responsibility
Explanation:
You are not required to go to college, but Samuel is doing it anyway
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
