Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
It allows the police to perform unwarned interrogations. (That is so intresting to me!)
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Wealth, power and prestige are unequally distributed among people around the world. As a result, individuals in societies around the world can be easily grouped according to how much wealth, power and prestige that they possess.
Such grouping known as Global Stratification classifies individuals around the world according to their different lifestyle and life chances due to unequal distribution of wealth, power and prestige. Such classification draws attention to the inequalities between people in different countries of the world.
Answer:
The term is used in describing the amount of control or influence that consumers have on the market is sovereignty
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
This is the whole purpose of the European Union to help the members of the nations by all the reasons listed on question C