Answer:
To have someone else give you suggestions for improvement.
Explanation:
Peer editors can help you catch mistakes, as well as suggest ways to make your writing better.
Answer:
On the one hand, the moral of The Bundle of Sticks, reflects on the idea that "union makes strength": when each of the sons tried to break the entire bundle of sticks, no one was able to do it. Therefore, the dying father tells them: "untie the bundle and each of you take a stick", so the sons were finally able to break the sticks, by breaking them individually, but in the end, through the union of the brother's forces, altogether.
On the other hand, the moral of "Hofus the stonecutter", refers to how people unecessarily want to be superior in hierarchy in society. The tale shows how a stonecutter always wishes to become someone or something superior than him, for instance, when he sees that the cloud is stronger than the sun (when he was the sun), so he wishes to be "the storm". But in the end, he realizes the stonecutter was the strongest of all.
Explanation:
hmu if yah need more help! :)
Answer:
I think it would be A. Leave it as is, because the other answers don't sound right, or don't have any commas.
Hope this helped! :)
The correct answers are the following:
A.3 Social criticism. In this excerpt, the author engages in social criticism because he analyses injustices and the condition of the society. During the French revolution, people were in a sorrowful state.
B.2 A critical. The author has a critical tone. The author expresses the disillusionment with society.
C.3 Realist. The novel is written in a realist style. This style is used to depict and criticize injustice. The author presents accurate depictions of the social conditions at that time.
Answer:
Fallacy is the use of invalid or otherwise faulty reasoning, or "wrong moves" in the construction of an argument. Faulty reasoning occurs when the conclusion is not supported by the data.
"What to the slave is the Fourth of July?" is faulty reasoning because it's incorrect thinking, and not based on correct conclusions and isn't supported by data or facts.
