Answer:
stare decisis
Explanation:
In law, stare decisis can be described as a situation in which historical cases are used for forming a rule when a similar case is seen. In this type of system, rules are formed in consideration of the previous rules which were acknowledged for a similar case. Stare decisis simply means to stand by what is already decided. The principle of stare decisis is the core of U.S common law. All court relies on U.S supreme court precedents.
Answer:
I, II and III are statements that are correct about non-value-added activities.
Explanation:
Activities that don't exactly add value(s) to a product or service are called non-value-added-activities. Though they are often times dispensable, it does not mean they are not important or necessary. Sometimes they form an inherent part in the design process of the product or service in question. Examples of such activities are filing of product/service documentation, inspecting the product/service, reviewing of the product/service and obtaining approvals. Therefore, non-value-added-activities may be necessary but are most times being performed in an inefficient and improvable manner and can be eliminated without necessarily deteriorating the quality of the product/service, its performance or perceived value.
<em>Hope this helps!</em>
Answer:
Each would move off in a different straight line
Answer:
Satisficing
Explanation:
It is a decision making strategy which aimed to purposed a satisfactorily result. Satisficing concentrate on realistic efforts when encountering the task. This strategy aims to focus on the optimal level of solutions. The theory of satisficing was found to be applied in field economics, artificial intelligence, and sociology. Satisficing is a strategy adopted by an organization that seeks to meet the minimal level of expectancies for credits. This contradiction put to maximize the profit by combined attempts that put the organization high demands on the performance crosswise sales, marketing, and other departments.
Answer:
Johnson's vision of Reconstruction had proved remarkably lenient. Very few Confederate leaders were prosecuted. By 1866, 7,000 Presidential pardons had been granted. Brutal beatings of African-Americans were frequent.
