Answer:
n = 1 second formula
n = 0 first formula
Step-by-step explanation:
I answer this in the other question you put, here it is again.
This is easy to get. We know the sequence cause it follows a pattern of 8, so let's try some values of n from 1 to 4, to get those numbers with the first formula:
n = 1,2,3,4
f(1) = 8(1) + 2 = 10
f(2) = 8(2) + 2 = 18
f(3) = 8(3) + 2 = 26
f(4) = 8(4) + 2 = 34
As you can see, with the first formula, the first term is 10, and not 2. The only way to get 2 with n = 1 is with the second formula:
f(1) = 8(1) - 6 = 2
f(2) = 8(2) - 6 = 10
f(3) = 8(3) - 6 = 18
f(4) = 8(4) - 6 = 26
With n = 1, the second formula was better and correct.
The first formula could be right only beggining with n = 0. Here is the proof:
f(0) = 8(0) + 2 = 2
Answer:3,312.50
Step-by-step explanation:1. We assume, that the number 2500 is 100% - because it's the output value of the task.
2. We assume, that x is the value we are looking for.
3. If 2500 is 100%, so we can write it down as 2500=100%.
4. We know, that x is 3.25% of the output value, so we can write it down as x=3.25%.
5. Now we have two simple equations:
1) 2500=100%
2) x=3.25%
where left sides of both of them have the same units, and both right sides have the same units, so we can do something like that:
2500/x=100%/3.25%
6. Now we just have to solve the simple equation, and we will get the solution we are looking for.
To write this in standard form, you need to eliminate the
fraction in the coefficient of variable x. You can do this by multiplying 8 to
the two sides of the equation:
8(y) = 8[(-5/8)x + 3]
8y = -5x + 24
Transpose the variable x to the other side:
5x + 8y = 24
Answer:0.245
Step-by-step explanation:
