Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
D. Evidence of title transfer of goods to customers.
Explanation:
The bill of lading is a legally binding document that provides the carrier and shipper with all of the necessary details to accurately process a shipment. It has three main functions. (1) it is a document of title to the goods described in the bill of lading. (2) it is a receipt for the shipped products. (3) the bill of lading represents the agreed terms and conditions for the transportation of the goods.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Under Agency Law in relation to employment, the salesperson is acting as an agent of the owner of the store and as such is their representative. As their representative, it is assumed that whatever they are selling is from the Owner whom they represent and as such can be binding on the owner.
This is why the Agent must act in the best interest of the owner because the owner could be held negligent for the actions of their agents. For instance, a salesperson will not be sued for a faulty equipment that caused harm but the store can.
Using the "Thinking at Margin" methodology, the relevant statement for a television maker to consider while making a choice is as follows: the average cost of ten TVs is one hundred dollars apiece. Option C. This will be discussed in further detail below.
<h3>What exactly does "Thinking at Margin" entail?</h3>
In most cases, it means giving some consideration to the action that will come next in your plan. The word "marginal" may also be used to signify "additional." The first glass of lemonade you drink on a hot day will quench your thirst, but successive glasses may not have the same impact on you.
When you contemplate at the margin, you are considering what the next or succeeding action will mean for you on an individual level.
In conclusion, using the "Thinking at Margin" technique, the following are the essential points for a television producer to take into consideration before making a decision when it comes to television programming: The usual cost of creating ten televisions is one thousand dollars each. Alternative C
Learn more about Thinking at the Margins by visiting this link: brainly.com/question/4468044 #SPJ1
Answer: Personnel selection
Explanation: In simple words, personnel selection is a single term used for the collection of activities recruitment, hiring and acculturation. It involves appointing the suitable individual for the job vacant in the firm.
In the given case, Ed is hiring a human resource professional for his firm. Thus, from the above we can conclude that he should use the term personnel selection.
