Answer:
Arizona v. Gant
Explanation:
Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a USA Supreme Court choice stating that the 4th Amendment to the USA Constitution requires law implementation officials to exhibit a real and proceeding with danger to their wellbeing presented by an arrestee, or a need to protect proof identified with the wrongdoing of capture from altering by the arrestee, so as to legitimize a warrantless vehicular pursuit episode to capture directed after the vehicle's ongoing tenants have been captured and made sure about.
It begins to rain!
Hope this helps (:
I believe it’s A or B I’m leaning towards A but I’ll look up the definition definition: “intellectual property rights are the rights given to people over the the creations of their minds. They usually give the creator an exclusive right over the use of his/her creation for a certain period of time” so The answer is
ANSWER- B
Answer: a chemical system reaches a state where the concentrations of reactants and products is a constant ratioequilibrium can be reached from any direction, i.e., by beginning with a mixture of reactants or products, or both
Explanation:
Answer:
Simple!! Profiling!
Explanation:
Tons say that felons are discriminated and profiled negatively based on their race, class, gender, AND appearance. If law enforcement were to see someone with tattoos, that person has a chance of being criminally profiled in a negative way. It's the same for if you see a southern, black, hispanic, or Arabic felon. Yes, I have to say, they are interrogated fairly, but I would say law enforcement is stereotypical of the people in which they arrest. You're welcome!
