Answer:
Taylorism
Explanation:
Taylorism, often referred to as Scientific Management, was the first theory of management to focus specifically on analyzing and optimizing workflows. These theories of process optimization helped drive the Fordist shift to mass production which occurred in the early part of the 20th Century. Taylorism can be boiled down to 4 principal points: The method of doing a task should be informed by a scientific investigation of the task , employees should be selected and carefully trained for tasks ,tasks should have detailed instructions and should be subject to supervision and management should evaluate tasks and formulate optimized approaches for the workers to follow .
Some forms of analysis might be done by timing how long it takes a worker to do a task, others by weighing raw materials. Process analysis, for Taylor, had to look at both the minutiae of the process composition and the detail of the physical acts required to complete the process. The elements of process improvement Taylor advocated for were successful in regards to processing materials; changing the way steel was cut and patenting that process. Yet, during his life, Taylor struggled to achieve quite the same success improving the efficiency of workers. Taylorism was first scientifically understanding how the production process worked and then supporting the managers of a workplace to intimately train workers to work at maximum efficiency. This way, the means towards higher returns is paved with a well-managed, harmonious relationship between managers and workers. In theory, this would have been a much more sustainable model for an organization. But despite that promise, people, although genetically similar, are intrinsically unique and complex. Aligning different minds and ushering people to a new way of working (from individual craft, to standardized production), sometimes require more time and effort than bringing in a new piece of technology.
Answer:
The correct answer is: D. Marketing information system.
Explanation:
Modern marketing requires more dynamic and intelligent information systems every day. The real-time information for decision making every day becomes more relevant. Focusing marketing strategies on the knowledge of customers and markets, requires having antennas placed on the market and multi-source data collection systems that allow anticipating market trends and thus making smarter decisions. Technology, Big Data and artificial intelligence are changing the rules of the Information Systems game.
The Marketing Information System and the digitalization of processes go hand in hand, allowing companies to use technology as a tool for making timely decisions for the market.
Resembled to more developed countries, slight developed countries have a higher ratio of workers in the condition of goods and services the tertiary sector most individuals must produce food for their survival sector of the economizing.
<h3>What is the difference between a more developed country and a less developed country?</h3>
A developed country is a government that has a high level of automation and per capita income while a developing country is a country that is still in the early phases of industrial development and has a low per capita revenue.
To learn more about developing countries visit the link
brainly.com/question/14927048
#SPJ4
Answer:
The annual dividend expected to be paid by the stock nine years from today (D9) is $11.27 per share.
Explanation:
Note: See the attached excel file for the calculations of annual dividends expected to be paid the stock for Years 1 to 9.
In the attached excel file, the following formula is used:
Current year dividend = Previous year dividend * (100% + Growth rate)
From the attached excel file, the annual dividend expected to be paid by the stock nine years from today (D9) is $11.27 per share (Note: see the bold red color under the Year's 9 Current Year Dividend).
The answer is 9%. According to the CBO, defense expenditure
grew 9% yearly on average from fiscal year 2000-2009. Much of the costs for the
conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have not been subsidized through regular arrogations
bills, but over emergency supplemental appropriations bills.
