1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Flura [38]
3 years ago
6

Explain what push and pull factors are and how they affect migration.

History
2 answers:
kiruha [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A "push" would be something that may prevent you from saying yes to something or prevent you from doing that option, it pushes you towards the other choice. A "pull" makes it easier to make that choice, it pulls you in that direction (metaphorically). Pull factors affect those who migrate because these pull factors may be better jobs and better homes for their family which would pull them towards migrating. Something that may push them would be the risks of getting caught and arrested or even worse.

Explanation:

Phoenix [80]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Push factors “push” people away from their home and include things like war. Pull factors “pull” people to a new home and include things like better opportunities. The reasons people migrate are usually economic, political, cultural, or environmental.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What do geographers study
nalin [4]
<span>A geographer is someone who studies the earth and its land, features, and inhabitants. They also examine phenomena such as political or cultural structures as they relate to geography. They study the physical or human geographic characteristics or both of a region, ranging in scale from local to global.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Initially, settlers in Maryland could elect a representative assembly, but they could not draft legislation. true or false
marysya [2.9K]
<span>Initially, settlers in Maryland could elect a representative assembly, but they could not draft legislation. true or false
The answer is TRUE
</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how did the supreme court define the role of the federal government in Marbury v. Madison (1803) and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819
Artist 52 [7]
In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to create the Second Bank of the United States and that the state of Maryland lacked the power to tax the Bank. Arguably Chief Justice John Marshall's finest opinion, McCulloch not only gave Congress broad discretionary power to implement the enumerated powers, but also repudiated, in ringing language, the radical states' rights arguments presented by counsel for Maryland.

At issue in the case was the constitutionality of the act of Congress chartering the Second Bank of the United States (BUS) in 1816. Although the Bank was controlled by private stockholders, it was the depository of federal funds. In addition, it had the authority to issue notes that, along with the notes of states' banks, circulated as legal tender. In return for its privileged position, the Bank agreed to loan the federal government money in lieu of taxes. State banks looked on the BUS as a competitor and resented its privileged position. When state banks began to fail in the depression of 1818, they blamed their troubles on the Bank. One such state was Maryland, which imposed a hefty tax on "any bank not chartered within the state." The Bank of the United States was the only bank not chartered within the state. When the Bank's Baltimore branch refused to pay the tax, Maryland sued James McCulloch, cashier of the branch, for collection of the debt. McCulloch responded that the tax was unconstitutional. A state court ruled for Maryland, and the court of appeals affirmed. McCulloch appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in 1819.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you think George Washington meant when he complained “we are one nation today and thirteen tomorrow
ArbitrLikvidat [17]
The states were all trying to create their own government and all the other nations were confused as to who wanted what in trade or how anything worked
3 0
3 years ago
Which was not used to justify European imperialism in the late nineteenth century?
AleksandrR [38]
The philosophy of Karl Marx was not used to justify European imperialism in the late nineteenth century. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option. Karl Marx was a revolutionary socialist and was born on 5th of may in the year 1818 and died on 14th of March in the year 1883.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the primary government during the Middle Ages? church, barbarians, kings, or serfs?
    14·2 answers
  • During a trial, a woman charged with tax fraud refuses to testify in court or answer the prosecutor's questions. The jury ultima
    12·2 answers
  • Which reform resulted from the fire at the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory?
    5·1 answer
  • Which factor contributed to the fall of communism in the Soviet Union?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the Roman Empire influence English, Spanish, Italian, and French languages?
    5·2 answers
  • The pan-africanism movement grew out of prior antislavery movements and from african associations. it fought for the african peo
    11·1 answer
  • What was a consequence of the Partition of India after 1947?
    13·1 answer
  • It is a because that right
    12·1 answer
  • Why did Roosevelt deliver the "Four Freedoms" as part of the State of the Union address?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of distarged as its used in the sentence, from the text boston tea party eyewitness account
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!