There is a 50% chance that the card will be even
2,4,6,8,10 as opposed to 1,3,5,7,9.
5/10 or 1/2
There is a 40% chance that the card will less than 5
1,2,3,4 as opposed to 5,6,7,8,9,10.
4/10 or 2/5
Answer:
y =
x - 5
y = 2x + 5
Step-by-step explanation:
In linear equations, both variables x and y must have the exponent of 1 (i.e. they cannot have a small number at the top-right). And they cannot be in the exponents (i.e. cannot be the small number at the top-right).
Answer:
a.Z(-2,1)
b.Z(1,1)
c.Z(-3,2)
Step-by-step explanation:
z(-2,3)
Imagine this point on a graph.
Translate it down two units :
the x stays -2, by going down the y decreases 2 so 3-2=1
Z(-2,1)
Translate Right three units : I'm assuming that we use the answer from the first translation
Z(-2,1)
The y doesn't change this time the x increases 3 since we're moving to the right.
Z(1,1)
Translate up 1 and left 4:
Z(1,1)
by moving up one we have Z(1,2) then by moving 4 to the left we get Z(-3,2)
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
1. Assume the contrary, namely that √2 + √3 + √5 = r, where r is a rational number.
Square the equality √2 + √3 = r − √5 to obtain 5 + 2
√6 = r2 + 5 − 2r
√5. It follows
that 2√6 + 2r
√5 is itself rational. Squaring again, we find that 24 + 20r2 + 8r
√30
is rational, and hence √30 is rational, too. Pythagoras’ method for proving that √2 is
irrational can now be applied to show that this is not true. Write √30 = m
n in lowest
terms; then transform this into m2 = 30n2. It follows that m is divisible by 2 and because
2( m
2 )2 = 15n2 it follows that n is divisible by 2 as well. So the fraction was not in lowest
terms, a contradiction. We conclude that the initial assumption was false, and therefore
√2 + √3 + √5 is irrational.
Step-by-step explanation: