Answer: 5.9%
Explanation:
Before:
Equity is calculated as:
= Total Assets / Equity Multiplier
= $ 175,000 / 1.2
= $ 145,833
Therefore, ROE will be:
= (Turnover × Profit Margin) / Equity
= ($ 395,000 × 5.3%) / $ 145,833
= $ 20935 / $145,833
= 0.1436
= 14.36%
After:
New Total Assets will be:
= $ 175,000 - $ 51,000
= $ 124,000
Equity
= Total Assets / Equity Multiplier
= $ 124,000 / 1.2
= $ 103,333
ROE will then be:
= (Turnover × Profit Margin) / Equity
= ($ 395,000 × 5.3%) / $ 103,333
= $ 20935 / $ 103,333
= 0.2026
= 20.26%
Therefore, the change in ROE will be:
= 20.26% - 14.36%
= 5.9%
= 4.035%
I believe the answer is: Injury
Risk refers to the danger or negative outcomes that arise when we decided to follow a certain decision.
From the options above, taxes and rent are considered as Obligations rather than a risk.
And insurance is considered as risk management, not the risk itself.
Explanation:
The answer to this question is contained in the attachment. The graph has been used to explain the solution.
A. As license got suspended price rose to p1 as quantity fell from q to q1.
So quantity decreased and price rose.
B. The area market csps, D ands cs were consumer surpluses , after the decrease in amount of vaccines in the market, consumer surplus decreased to area cs, csps became part of producer surplus. Triangle d is the deadweight loss caused by fall in quantity.
Ps and d' are initial producer surplus. Producer surplus after decrease in vaccine can be seen in ps and csps. D' is the dead weight loss as price decreases.
Answer and explanation:
<em>Language </em>and <em>culture </em>affect directly in people's communication. Somebody who grew up in the jungle surrounded by its people is likely to have an open way of communicating with others since that individual has grown up within a society that is in great part his or her family. On the other hand, someone who is raised in a metropolis is likely to be more careful while communicating with others since that person is more exposed to different people with different cultures that react differently to situations.
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that the name Coke was so well known around the world, that it is effectively a common term for the trademarked Coca Cola. If other companies try to use similar terms like Koke for other types of products, e.g. bakery items, there is a risk that the Coca Cola company would be negatively affected by that product's image since consumers might associate Koke directly to Coca Cola.
It doesn't matter if the products were low quality or not, the courts cannot determine that, what matters is that the use of the term may negatively impact another company.
