Answer:
$2.89
Explanation:
The formula and the computation of the earning per share is shown below:
Earning per share = (Net income - preference dividend) ÷ (Number of shares)
where,
Net income is
= $911,300 × 5.87%
= $53,493.31
And, the preference dividend is $0
and, the outstanding number of shares is 18,500
So earning per share is
= $53,493.31 ÷ 18,500 shares
= $2.89
Answer:
E) None of these
Explanation:
Calculation to determine which of the following is the mean time between arrivals
Using this formula
Mean time between arrivals = 1/Arrival rate
Let plug in the formula
Mean time between arrivals= 1/12
Mean time between arrivals= 0.0833 hours or 5 minutes
Therefore the Mean time between arrivals will be 0.0833 hours or 5 minutes
It is true that Enterprise risk management is a valuable approach that can better align security functions with the business mission while offering opportunities to lower costs.
<h3>What is Risk Management?</h3>
In order to limit, monitor, and control the likelihood or impact of unfortunate events or to maximize the realization of possibilities, risk management entails the identification, appraisal, and prioritization of risks (defined by ISO 31000 as the influence of uncertainty on objectives).
Instability in global markets, threats from project failures (at any stage of design, development, production, or maintenance of life cycles), legal liabilities, credit risk, accidents, natural causes and disasters, deliberate attack from an adversary, or events with uncertain or unpredictable root causes are just a few examples of the many different types of risks that can arise.
To know more about Risk Management, visit: brainly.com/question/4680937
#SPJ4
Solution:
Let's start by assuming that the taxi ride demand is extremely elastic, to the extent that it is vertically sluggish! If the cabbies raise the fair price by 10% from 10.00 per mile to 11.00 per kilometre, the number of riders remains 20.
Total income before fair growth= 20* 10= 200.
Total income following fair growth = 11* 20= 220.
A 10% increase in the fare therefore leads to a 10% increase in the driver's revenue.
Therefore, the assumption in this situation is that the cab drivers think the taxi driving requirement is highly inelastic.
The demand curve facing the drivers of the cab is still inelastic, but not vertically bent.
When the rate increased from 10% to 11, riders declined from 20% to 19%
Total revenue before fair growth is 20* 10= 200
The gap between revenue and fair growth is 19* 11= 209
This means that a realistic 10% raise doesn't result in a 10% boost on income Because the market curve for taxi rides is not 100% inelastic, but rather low inelastic, so that a fair increase (control) allows consumers to lose their incomes.
Answer:
hmmmm i'd say true if not then false
