After examining Jackson’s accomplishments compared to his shortcomings and controversies, it can be difficult to be unbiased when deciding if he should or should not be replaced on the bill. Many historians and scholars are in disagreement with each other on the topic. Some believe he should be featured on the back of the bill and not the front George Washington, the first president of the United States, appears on the $1 bill and was also a slaveholder like Jackson. Around 300 slaves lived at Mount Vernon when George Washington died. He also supported legislation upholding slavery and also opposed other legislation on slavery. He signed the fugitive slave act guaranteed a right for a slaveholder to recover an escaped slave. He also signed the Northwest Ordinance that recognized the Northwest territory and outlawed slavery within the territory. He never publicly denounced slavery as an institution, and there is no discussion of removing him from the $1 bill.
When taking a closer look at the behaviors of both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, we can see that they share similarities with Jackson. If removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill is considered then so should removing Washington and Jefferson. However, Jackson is far too controversial, especially in recent years. He would be in the right spot if he was moved to the back of the bill, and someone like Harriet Tubman replaced him in the front. His accomplishments earn him his place on the bill, but his controversial actions lessen what he has earned which is why he should appear on the back. Especially compared to President Abraham Lincoln, who is featured on the $5 bill, Jackson should be featured on the back of the bill. Lincoln who had some of the greatest presidential accomplishments, like the passing of the 13th Amendment and the Emancipation Proclamation
The answer to this question is <span>Charles Weidman
</span>
Friedman is a memorable modern dancer with considerable levels of iconic influence. He also served as a choreographer and a teacher. He came into the limelight during the roaring twenties,and the subsequent rise of the jazz music.
<span></span>
The Civil War increased the number of enslaved people to go against The owner people. A lot of other people escaped to the North and fought for the Union.
The American leaders in Washington didn't think that Japan would attack in Hawaii.
That suggestion clears up the question and points to the real issue:
Washington thought, because it was so "alerted and prepared", that Hawaii would would be the last place Japan would plan an attack on.
Well, that, evidently, wasnt the case.
The nation that was responsible for the destruction of the Songhai empire was <u>Morocco</u>.
<h3>who destroyed the Songhai?</h3>
after about a century of dominance in western Africa, the Songhai empire went on the decline.
this allowed Morocco to demand tribute from them and when there was a civil war in the empire, the Moroccans took advantage and destroyed them.
find out more on the SONGHAI EMPIRE at brainly.com/question/1673927.
#SPJ1