Answer:
The conclusion that can be drawn from the research shows that the choice of cars among the men and the woman is subject according to their opinions and needs.
While the women made a choice due to the need to have a reliable car (hence not needing a new one in few years to come ), the men made their choice based on the colour of the car (inoder to bring out the beauty of the car).
Explanation:
Explanation:
<h3>Lithium is widely distributed but does not occur in nature in its free form. Because of its reactivity, it is always found bound with one or more other elements or compounds. ... The metal is separated from other elements in igneous rocks, and is also extracted from the water of mineral springs.</h3>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not include the material from Item A, we can say that yes, labeling and other in-school factors are the main cause of social class differences in educational achievement.
With so many students in school from different social classes, it seems difficult to put a limit on labeling. However, school authorities and teachers should pay closer attention to this issue because it affects children and their decision to continue to attend school. Labeling is also a cause of bullying in educational centers. So we have to consider this as a current issue that must be confronted.
Parents should play a key role in diminishing labeling, setting a good example in the house, and talking to their children about the importance of respect and tolerance.
Answer:
Explanation:
By exercising its power to determine the constitutionality of federal and state government actions, the Supreme Court has developed a large body of judicial decisions, or “precedents,” interpreting the Constitution. How the Court uses precedent to decide controversial issues has prompted debate over whether the Court should follow rules identified in prior decisions or overrule them. The Court’s treatment of precedent implicates longstanding questions about how the Court can maintain stability in the law by adhering to precedent under the doctrine of stare decisis while correcting decisions that rest on faulty reasoning, unworkable standards, abandoned legal doctrines, or outdated factual assumptions.
