I believe the answer is A (:
The lower creatures speak to the greater part. When you take a gander at the manner in which socialism and communism have verifiably assumed control whole social orders you see that it takes the "lower" creatures to become tied up with what the little group of authority is advancing. These kinds of social orders are engendered; individuals are attracted and yet what they're being sold. At the point when a vast gathering of individuals (or creatures) lives in a general public where their necessities are being met, they have no cash, ect., the guarantee of "allows all offer," and everybody is equivalent," are extremely engaging. In the event that you trusted that you'd discover a calling and work for $50,000 every year, and afterward you discovered that under a specific sort of government your neighbor down the road would make the same amount of for doing nothing...... let me know, would you work. Okay feel any draw whatsoever to practice or achieve your maximum capacity in the event that you realized that everybody would share an equivalent part of the riches in any case? That is the thing that makes America awesome; free enterprise. Hence, to comprehend what truly occurred on the ranch, or Russia maybe, it was fundamental for Orwell to compose the story the manner in which he did with the end goal for us to see how ground-breaking publicity truly is.
Yes, because you have a subject (Frodo Baggins) and a predicate (spent).
Answer:
hawk man could protect her but are mother could not
