Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
The argument of moral reformer can be understood by using an example. If S would be a moral reformer, she is someone who believes that some aspects of her personal society's ethical compass are erroneous; she believes that behaviors that the code declares to be immoral are actually acceptable, or conversely.
Thus, both the moral reformers and relativism implies that there is not one correct actions but many as per the perspective of different doers.
<span>His work will make you use the value of ecosystem services in your environmental policy work. He believed on putting a price tag on nature to show how much it is worth and why it needed protection. He figured the monetary value might make more people care.</span>
The answer is False for that one
