To reflect in the line y = -x + 6, we translate everything down 6 first. This will make it seem like we are reflecting in the line y = -x
(x,y) → (x, y-6)
Then, to reflect in the line y = -x, we switch the x- and y-coordinates and then make them negative
(x,y) → (-(y-6), -x)
Then we move everything back up again
(x,y) → (-(y-6), -x + 6)
I will present to you an example. Reflect the point (-4, 8) in the line y = -x + 6.
(-4,8) → (-(8-6), -(-4) + 6) → (-2, 10)
You should graph this out to confirm with the reflection line.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
See attachment for wedge
Required
The sample space of the wedge is:
The outcomes greater than 5 are:
So, the probability is:
This gives:
" of " means multiply
1/4 * 3.20/1...and just multiply....(1 * 3.20) / (4 * 1) = 3.20/4 = 0.8
or
1/4 = 0.25.....0.25(3.20) = 0.8
One question, are they congruent figures?
For x = -3, <span>(-0.7x) equals (-0.7[-3]), or 2.1.
8 8 8
Then f(-3) = ------------------- = ---------------- = ------------ = 0.31 (approx)
1 + 3*e^2.1 1 + 24.499 25.5</span>
