Answer:
The option which weaken the conclusion drawn is:
E. All artists who receive grants and donations are completely dependent on that money to cover their daily expenses; without those funds, they would have to discontinue the practice of their art.
Explanation:
The conclusion drawn in the passage is that grants and donations are a bad things because they actually make artists lose the interest for work. The passage claims that artists only practice art because they need to survive.
<u>The option that weakens that conclusion is the one that goes against it. In that case, we should choose letter E, since it claims the opposite. It states that artists need the money they receive in the form of grants and donations. If they cannot cover their expenses, they cannot work. If grants and donations help them cove their expenses, they are able to work. Therefore, letter E is the best option.</u>
Answer:
The given claim: "The good depends on the results of what you do." which refers to the concept of Consequentialism.
Explanation:
Consequentialism:
It is such a philosophy that is based on the following principles:
- The act may be considered good or bad depending upon its good or bad results.
- The more good results an act produce, the more right will be the act.
- The problem with the given claim is that the person who follow this theory can say that: It is good to murder a X person as this X person is dangerous for some 50 people. Because this act of murdering is giving relief to 50 people so the murder of a single person is justifiable.
The answer is C, they run independent campaigns in support of candidates.
To receive; obtain.
ex: you will inherit your grandfather's watch.
