Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
Answer:
On the other hand, the Americans had many intangible advantages.
The British fought a war far from home. Military orders, troops, and supplies sometimes took months to reach their destinations. The British had an extremely difficult objective. They had to persuade the Americans to give up their claims of independence. As long as the war continued, the colonists' claim continued to gain validity. The geographic vastness of the colonies proved a hindrance to the British effort. Despite occupying every major city, the British remained as at a disadvantage.
Americans had a grand cause: fighting for their rights, their independence and their liberty. This cause is much more just than waging a war to deny independence. American military and political leaders were inexperienced, but proved surprisingly competent.
The war was expensive and the British population debated its necessity. In Parliament, there were many American sympathizers. Finally, the alliance with the French gave Americans courage and a tangible threat that tipped the scales in America's favor.
SOURCE: http://www.ushistory.org/us/11a.asp
This ended up setting up the peaceful process for settling any future disputes that may come about.
The information of the article confirms some conditions described by Clara Lemlich such as the lack of protocols and space inside factories.
By the beginning of the 20th-century industrialization grew and expanded in the United States. This change implied the need for more workers and production. Due to this and other factors, working conditions during this time were not the best. It was common:
- Children had to work.
- Workers work for 10 hours or more.
- Wages were low.
- Accidents were common.
These conditions were reported by many during this time, this included the "Preliminary Report" by an investigating commission and an article written by Carla Lemlich who led the women's labor movement. Because the historical and geographical context was the same Lemilich confirmed some details about the conditions described in the report such as:
- Neglection of human factor: The safety and welfare of workers was not considered as production was prioritized.
- Lack of protocols: Lemlich confirmed there were no protocols related to emergencies especially fire scapes, safety, hygiene, etc.
- Lack of space: Lemlich confirms the space inside factories is very limited due to machines and workers.
Note: This question is incomplete because the report is missing; here is the name of the report the question refers to:
"Preliminary Report of the New York Factory Investigating Commission, 1912"
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1350450
The answer to your question is C.Pierre joseph Celoran
