The answer to this question is <span>to employ critical thinking techniques.
Pseudo-psychology tend to not be backed by a valid research to make the theory become reliabe.
With critical thinking techniques, pseudo-psychology could be easily debunked so you wouldn't be trapped within a false mindset to judge the situation that you're currently in</span>
Dr. mason is probably a clinical psychologist , whereas dr. jacobson is probably a psychiatrist;
The answer to this question is explained below.
Explanation:
There are two parts in this question. One is the possible heuristics when deciding whether you should study hard for the test, and secondly when ask someone for a date, or accept a date.
Studying hard for the test:
In deciding whether study hard for the test, you should consider the following heuristics:
- Think of your previous experience about studying and see if it worked for you.
- If it worked for you, go for it.
- If it did not work for you, try a better solution this time.
Asking someone for date(or vice versa):
In deciding whether to go on a date with someone, the following heuristics should be kept in mind:
- Think that what you know about the person you are asked or being asked about the date
- Know what your own limits are
- Make sure you know the person well before asking for a date.
Learn more about heuristics at:
brainly.com/question/2933570
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
had to complete 5 years of continuous residence before receiving ownership of the land
Explanation:
The consideration must be addressed when deciding for whom to produce is: <span>Who has the greatest need
by knowing the answer to this question, we could formulate a specific marketing strategy/ad campaign to target exactly that demographic and bring in the maximum profit.</span>
