Answer:
Search google but the answer is (8.31×10-3) (9.9×10)-6
Answer:
Work below
Step-by-step explanation:
49 total dogs.
36 more small dogs.
13 big dogs.
lol just realized today's school has sh*t wording and this question can be taken TWO ways. 36 more as in, 36 more dogs in total or 36 more small dogs than large dogs adding the amount of large dogs with this. this gives us 49.
the only way to get the x value (large dogs) and add this on top of the 36 (small dogs) and get 49 is to do 6.5 + 42.5 (36 + 6.5) this gives us 49.
Thanks guy in the comments for giving the second response, after some thinking i realized that i could also read it that way.
F** k today's hw and their wording
It depends on the results but for EX: The older you are there better grades you get or there is no relation(meaning that your age does not affect your grades)
Answer:
fyjjnbvfddddddddfghjkjhg
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
A. is the correct one. The statement makes sense.
Step-by-step explanation:
A. This is true because if you make your graph starting from the lowest value then the graph will use more space to fit the data and it will make it look bigger. Also, the variation will seem higher because it will feel that you are increasing it from 0, so the relative increase will be higher.
B. Reducing the range of the vertical axis will increase the relative size of variation, not make it decrease, as we explained in A.
C. Even though it is technically certain that the data shown is the same as before, the way to show data also matters. And by making changes on the presentation of your data you can obtain different results on the impression that leaves to people.
D. This is just false, because you are indeed dereasing the range of the vertical axis, not increasing it.
