Answer:
The element that would follow this statement is "text evidence from Niemand's argument"
Explanation:
The question is not complete since it does not provide the complete information, here is the complete information:
Read this passage from Giovanna's evaluation of an argument claiming that climate change is not affected by human
activity.
Niemand's article on climate change in the editorial section of today's newspaper offers a weak argument. His reasoning
consists of little more than unsubstantiated assertions that climate change is not affected by human activity.
In an effective evaluation, which element would follow this statement?
a. a summary of Niemand's claim
b. text evidence from Niemand's argument
c. a restatement of Giovanna's evaluation
d. the name and source of Niemand's article
The process of making an evaluation of an argument as Giovanna is doing with this lines has to support the idea with reliable evidence as to the next part of the information, this makes option B the best answer to describe what is the next step for Giovanna's evaluation as she will present the evidence to deny the counterclaims.
Answer: opinion
Explanation:
Runners can be sore from running and also not all runners have the same kind of sleep schedule or motivation to sleep at an appropriate time. They have other things in their life.
The purpose of this text from Amy Tan’s essay <em>“Mother Tongue.” </em>is to:
- Inform readers based on Tan’s childhood experience.
According to the given question, we are asked to state the purpose of this text from Amy Tan’s essay <em>“Mother Tongue.” </em>and how it affected the meaning of the text.
As a result of this, we can see that from the complete text, there is the narration about the Amy Tan and the problems she had with integrating into a <em>new culture</em> when they moved to America and were learning English and the different culture.
Read more about text purpose here:
brainly.com/question/12924288
My best guess would be A. knowing how to dissect a test and it’s questions
In cryptography, the hybrid argument is a proof technique used to show that two distributions are computationally indistinguishable.
