The italicized verb <em>will attend </em>is used in the future (simple) tense.
Future perfect would be - will have attended.
Future passive would be - will be attended.
<span>Since the pronoun comes after the predicate, I think "she" being used as a predicate nominative. So the answer is A:)</span>
While Shakespeare<span> was alive, many of his greatest </span>plays were performed<span> by the Lord Chamberlain's Men and King's Men acting companies at the Globe and Blackfriars </span>Theatres<span>.</span>
Answer:
I guess the answer is option 4 and it shows the conflict between nature and man
Explanation:
In Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game", the story revolves around the protagonist Sanger Rainsford, a famed hunter. After he was stranded in an island owned by Colonel Zaroff, he became the hunted/ prey, thus the reversal of roles. This led to his conflicts in trying to keep himself safe from the barbaric hands of the Colonel who was adamant on killing him for sport.
Conflicts in a story is when one attribute is in opposition against another factor, leading to a difference in opinion and fighting between the two sides.
The case of man versus nature conflict can be seen/ found in the sentence "What perils that tangle of trees and underbrush might hold for him did not concern Rainsford just then."
This sentence is after Rainsford escaped to the forest, eluding the Colonel. He no longer cares what the environment will do to him as long as he is safe from the guns and hands of the Colonel.
Of the opening sentences that were presented here that strongly engages the reader and provides context to them would be the second one which is "We could have had a worse weekend, but it's awfully hard to beat Bigfoot and bugs."
The first and third one were just not good enough because it exposes the rest of the context to the reader and lets them have the idea of what you are talking about which usually leads to the readers not choosing to continue to read, thus taking out the reader's engagement but still provides context. The last one is better than the first and third, but it spilled the beans when it mentioned the particulars as to what made the weekend bad to worse. The answer is just right. It has the impact that would hook the reader to know more about your weekend and why is Bigfoot and bugs together in your statement. The rain wasn't mentioned which would be ideal to make the story telling take a turn to much worse which would spike up the interest of the reader.
