The answer is cost benefit analysis.
Cost-benefit analysis, also known as benefit-cost analysis, is a methodical process for determining the advantages and disadvantages of potential solutions.
What is cost benefit analysis?
- Comparing expected or estimated costs and benefits (or opportunities) connected with a project choice in order to assess if it makes sense from a business perspective is the process of a cost-benefit analysis.
- A CBA can be used to compare completed or potential courses of action and to estimate or evaluate the value against the cost of a decision, project, or policy.
- It is used to decide which options provide the best approach to achieving benefits while preserving savings in, for example, transactions, activities, and functional business requirements.
- It is frequently used to assess commercial deals, project investments, and judgments about business or policy (especially public policy). Consider the U.S.
- Before enacting laws or deregulating existing ones, the Securities and Exchange Commission must perform cost-benefit analyses.
To learn more about cost benefit analysis visit:brainly.com/question/199821
#SPJ4
Answer:
In this case, the Supreme Court has to rule against Niskayuna High School. The reason for this is because the high school did not respect Goode's beliefs and practices when it came to religion. According to the summary, Goode had lost a Harvard scholarship just because of practicing religion. The high school does not have the right to take anything away from the student; therefore, the Supreme Court has to force the Highschool to pay for Goode's Harvard tuition. Also the court has to take into consideration the fact that the school violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendent, because every person in this world has to have the right to practice any religion as desired.
Answer:
Violation of privacy breach of 4th amendment right
Explanation:
Violates one's privacy because then you would've been illegally searched. Breach of 4th amendment comes from the right to protect against unwarranted/unwanted searches and/or seizures.
Answer:
d) redistributive taxation is unjust unless it remedies some past injustice
Explanation:
Rawls and Nozick were two American Philosophers, who took stand for inequality and injustice in U.S.
They both oppose the progressive system, which favors increase of tax as a share of the base size increases.
According to Rawls and Nozick, redistributive taxation should provide benefit to the people who have faced injustice in past through any mechanism such as schools, direct transfer, health care or other program that improve prospects of the poorest and injustice people.
Hence, the correct answer is d.