1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
antiseptic1488 [7]
3 years ago
6

The main party leaders in the House and Senate are:

Law
1 answer:
AnnZ [28]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The main party leaders in the house and Senate are

c The speaker and president pro Tempore

You might be interested in
1. Explain the interaction view of lawmaking and provide an example.
nordsb [41]

Answer:

1.=The creation of jaywalking laws would be an example of the interactionist view in lawmaking .The interactionist view states that the definition of crime reflects the preferences and opinions of people who hold social power in a particular legal jurisdiction ,such as the auto industry .

6 0
3 years ago
Many U.S. cities are adopting ranked voting in municipal elections, where voters rank the candidates in order of
aleksandrvk [35]
The answer is b definitely
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
"The Western legal system is more systematic than most of the other countries around the globe"
olganol [36]

Answer:

Its false because the judges in charge of sentencing will sometimes convict over emotional reasons

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not one of the three branches of the US CJS?
stepan [7]

Answer:

the answer is corrections

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does a traffic control officer do
    10·2 answers
  • 8. What is the process of identifying psychological and social characteristics surrounding the crime as well as the manner in wh
    15·2 answers
  • A construction contractor brought a breach of contract claim in federal court against a homeowner who had hired the contractor t
    13·1 answer
  • Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law discuss​
    14·1 answer
  • Why do civilians in the United States, Great Britain, or France join terrorist groups and agree to fight against their own count
    13·1 answer
  • What is a distance determination? How is this done?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following are examples of compassion?
    11·1 answer
  • Describe TWO ways in which the above law protects citizens against human right violations​
    6·2 answers
  • Kaakibat na tungkulin pumili ng lider na ihahalal <br>​
    6·1 answer
  • What do the different levels of licenses for security guards show about Florida’s monitoring methods?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!