Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
open a rear window in your car
Laws protect our general safety, and ensure our rights as citizens against abuses by other people, by organizations, and by the government itself. We have laws to help provide for our general safety.
Answer:
Libelo
Explanation:
Ang paninirang-puri ay maaaring ituring na libelo kung ito ay ginagawa sa pamamagitan ng artikulo na lumalabas sa mga diyaryo, magasin at iba pang babasahin. Ituturing naman itong oral defamation kung isinagawa ang paninirang puri sa pamamagitan ng sali-salita lamang.
