Back in those times, nobody had the experience or practice to make the things they painted look realistic. They didn’t really have the years of experience of people before them to go off of. Also, they probably had quite limited tools.
Answer:
Aug 9, 2007 im pretty sure.
Explanation:
Hi there the answer to your question is Physical Maps, hope I have helped you.
Just left to my own devices, I would have picked Stretch and/or Squash. The next closest thing (out of those three) is exaggeration. When you read the description of exaggeration, you find that physical characteristics can be exaggerated, but they should resemble some form of reality.
The second one is really a very close call. You could make a case for either secondary action, or follow through. The only one you could eliminate is pose to pose. That is reserved for how the action goes from one pose to another. That is more of a problem in technique than overall plotting. I think I'd pick follow through, because the character has stopped bouncing the ball, but he likely hasn't stopped sweating nor looking at his watch.
Pretty interesting question. You are not going to get asked that every day.
