1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelechka [254]
3 years ago
6

Is it child labor if a parent forces their child to help them with work.

Law
2 answers:
coldgirl [10]3 years ago
8 0
Well i would say it is labor, because they’re forcing a child to do something that they don’t want to do. like if they ask their child to help out. then that’s fine. but they’re forcing them to help, which isn’t right
just my opinion
Gelneren [198K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

No

Explanation:

It's fine as long as they don't make you act like the parent like cooking food for the baby, bathing the sibling etc. then it isn't child labor.

You might be interested in
How many senators does each state have in congress
dexar [7]

Answer:

2

Explanation: Each state has two congress members to have a equal amount of representation from each state.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
The "iron law of oligarchy" is a principle
dalvyx [7]

Answer:

B. Of organizational life according to which even democratic organizations will become bureaucracies ruled by a few individuals.

Explanation:

The "iron law of oligarchy" notes that all types of organization must gradually and inevitably develop oligarchic tendencies, regardless of how democratic they may be at the outset, rendering true democracy actually and theoretically impossible, particularly in large groups and complex organisations, it is an Organizational theory in which even a democratic entity inevitably evolves into a bureaucracy dominated by a few individuals.

The "iron law of oligarchy " reflects that if a democratic organisation, then a non-democratic organisation, will never be fully democratic.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is one of the exceptions to the general rule that searches must be conducted pursuant to a warrant
PtichkaEL [24]

The police may conduct a search incident to arrest after any constitutional arrest.

Answer: Option B

<u>Explanation:</u>

There are majorly six exceptions to the warrant requirements. The first one is the search incident to lawful arrest. The police can conduct a search incident after a lawful arrest has been made.

For this the police does not require the issuance of any warrant. The police can search the person and the area that is surrounding the person or the area which is within the wingspan of the person whose arrest is to be made by the police.

8 0
2 years ago
What is the dependent variable? What is the independent variable?
Marina86 [1]

In mathematical modeling, statistical modeling, and experimental sciences, there are independent and dependent variables.

  • Dependent variables get their name because, during an experiment, their values are examined under the assumption or requirement that they are dependent on the values of other variables due to some law or rule (for example, a mathematical function).
  • In the context of the experiment in question, independent variables are those that are not perceived as dependent on any other factors.

A body camera or wearable camera is a wearable audio, video, or photographic recording system used to capture events that law enforcement officers are involved in. On an officer's uniform, they are normally worn on the torso.

  • The deployment of police body cameras has drawn a lot of media attention in recent years. These tools are widely thought to accomplish a number of goals, including lowering police use-of-force and complaints against officers, improving police legitimacy and transparency, raising prosecution rates, and enhancing police evidence collection.
  • Because of all the exposure, many people now believe that cameras can fundamentally alter "flawed" police procedures.

Thus this is the answer of dependent and independent variable and police worn cameras.

To learn more about dependent and independent variable, refer:brainly.com/question/3764906

To learn more about police worn cameras, refer: brainly.com/question/21576230

#SPJ10

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • A law which promotes the opportunity for foreign workers to obtain employment, housing, and medical care regardless of their cit
    5·1 answer
  • What is the complexity of bullying?
    12·1 answer
  • In North Korea, What part of the economy does the government regulate?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a consequence of careless driving?
    11·2 answers
  • Please explain how the Declaration of Independence was a world altering
    12·1 answer
  • What is meant by the substitute judgement ?
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP! ╰(*°▽°*)╯(*゜ー゜*)U•ェ•*U ¯\(°_o)/¯
    5·2 answers
  • Need help please its for forensic science
    13·1 answer
  • Under the UCC Article 2, if a buyer breaches a sale of goods contract, the seller gets specific remedies.
    6·1 answer
  • How did the draft laws in the north and south differ.
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!