Cayman, Felicia.
MLA uses alphabetical order to sort citations, therefore Cayman would be first
Good Luck :)
Hey there!
The correct answer to your question is option B.
If Francis is writing an argumentative essay, "including at least three specific detailed examples after you have introduced your claim" is the most effective way for him to organize the reasons and evidence clearly.
This is because an argumentative essay is an essay that has an idea, that people can either disagree or agree with. Having three specific and detailed examples after you have already introduced your claim will probably help the audience agree with your idea.
Hope this helps you.
Have a great day!
To effectively write this story, note the main parts that should form the story. They are;
The introduction of the story should include information about something you desperately wanted but could not get because of some limitations. You have to include why you needed the thing so much.
In the body of the text, you have to provide details about the effort you put into achieving that which you wanted. State the hurdles you passed through.
In the conclusion, create a story of how you finally got that which you desired. End the story with the statement, "Better late than never".
Learn more about story writing here:
brainly.com/question/2412389
Answer:
1) This passage does not contain an argument. It begins with a comment that everyone knows the U.S. is having an election (in 2008); the author proceeds to state three things that he thinks Europe should focus on. He does not offer reasons for his statement that these three things are jobs, Muslims, and neighbors.
2) This passage contains both an argument and a sub-argument. 1.The butler was passionately in love with the victim. Thus, 2. It was not the butler who committed the murder. 3. Either the butler committed the murder or the judge committed the murder. Therefore, 4. The judge committed the murder. The sub-argument goes from (1) to (2), and the main argument goes from (2) and (3) to (4). Note again: identifying the structure does not imply saying that this is a good argument.
3) This passage contains an argument. Standardization: (1) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish can know whether that other person deserves punishment. (2) No one who cannot know whether another person deserves punishment has a right to punish that person. Therefore, (3) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish another person has a right to punish that person.
They would remember the character by their action
